The Taj Mahal.
Everybody would have heard about this masterpiece, the eternal symbol of love, the glorious beauty.
There I was, standing right before Taj Mahal, in awe, wondering at the no-words-to-describe monument. Everything else seemed so minute. I have seen nothing ever-so beautiful and might never see one until some romantic has a better way of expressing his love, which, might not be possible considering the resources needed. :) There is not one thing that is okay-ish about the mahal. Everything is just more than perfect. The sheer size of the monument, the grandeur of the four minarets, the as-white-as-snow marble and not to forget the intricate design on the walls, are all exceptional. One has to see it to believe it. I can't say more. So, I was standing before this Taj Mahal, admiring and cherishing that very moment feeling as small as a drop before the giant beauty.
Suddenly, the phone beside me rang, and the Taj Mahal disappeared into thin air without the slightest trace of the beauty I was seeing all that time. I realized I am now in Hyderabad, not in Agra, and it had been almost a week since my Agra trip and yet the illusions cease to stop. Every time I gaze into nothing, I see the Taj mahal forming from nowhere and this illusion of mine keeps recurring.
While Einstein was right about saying reality is just a persistent illusion, there should be some explanation as to why certain illusions out of these are more persistent than the others. May be the persistence is again linked to the forgetting-theory related to the brain. :) Much more complex than we can comprehend.
Coincidences never cease to exist with me. It was coincidental that besides these frequenting illusions, there is one more 'illusions' that I was part of in the recent days and that being Richard Bach's book - Illusions. Many of them have already said and keep saying the world's an illusion after all. I am not sure how true that is.
But one quote from Richard Bach might help explain my illusions about the Taj and the quote modified to suit the context is -
"If you want to be with the Taj, aren't you already there?"
May be I want to.
11 comments:
> "and it had been almost a week since my Agra trip and yet the illusions cease to stop"
hmm . . . what's wrong with this sentence?
Yeah, even I felt something was wrong with that phrase when I wrote it. The phrase "cease to exist" was so much in my mind and I used the phrase altering it to suit the context but somehow I felt it didn't mean what it was supposed to mean.
Guess the meaning is altered with that phrase.
Let me replace it with "illusions do not stop". Simple and clear :)
Thanks for pointing that out. I can always rely on you for pointing mistakes.
> "I can always rely on you for pointing mistakes"
hmm . . . now what's wrong with that one?
nothing wrong with the syntax. the semantics is what concerns me :)
well, I have learnt that it is best to be simple and clear and straight to the point. :)
So no need for any concern I think, there is nothing hidden in that.
mee english grammar lolli endi ra bai
ikkada ekkada grammar prasakthi raaledu inthavaraku. addalu marichipoyinava? he he.
Seems like 'Richard Bach' had an equal impact on you as 'Taj Mahal' in having your "Illusions"...
I can't say it is 'equal'. Most of us would accept the fact that the Taj would leave an indelible impression, for a lifetime. :) But Mr. Bach sure helped explain my illusions ;)
finally my frnd is in love with a thing atleast!!! ;) hehehe
Who the hell is this mass?????????
My desire to see Taj Mahal double after reading this post.
Post a Comment